Numerous Times

Inside Stories · Outside Proof

Visionaries

Visionaries

The Margin War: Why Bjorn Gulden Is Cannibalizing the Hype Machine

By aggressively discounting the industry’s most coveted silhouettes, Adidas is betting that market share matters more than the artificial scarcity of the past decade.

Numerous Times Visionaries Desk

Profiles of the operators bending the next decade

September 18, 2026 · 3 min read
The Margin War: Why Bjorn Gulden Is Cannibalizing the Hype Machine
Photo: Unsplash

For the last decade, the sneaker industry operated under a singular, rigid theology: scarcity is the only sustainable currency. From the era of limited-edition drops to the calculated bottlenecking of supply chains, the goal was to keep the secondary market thriving while the primary market remained perpetually sold out. But as we move deeper into 2026, Adidas is executing a strategic pivot that many luxury purists consider a suicide mission. By flooding the market with aggressive pricing incentives and double-digit discounts on even their trendiest silhouettes, the German sportswear giant is intentionally devaluing the 'hype' to capture something far more valuable—total retail dominance.

Bjorn Gulden is not interested in the vanity metrics of StockX premiums. He is making a bet that the next decade belongs to the operator who can operationalize scale without losing soul. The recent wave of steep promotional activity across their performance and lifestyle lines represents a fundamental break from the prestige-pricing model. While competitors cling to the safety of high margins and low volume, Adidas is opting for a brute-force land grab. They are betting that in a volatile global economy, the consumer’s loyalty belongs to the brand that provides the best price-to-aesthetic ratio, not the one that makes them wait in a digital queue for a privilege they likely won't win.

What is at risk here is the brand’s hard-won cultural capital. There is a very real danger that by making their 'It-shoes' too accessible, they trigger a rapid cooling of the brand’s desirability. In the fashion cycle, ubiquity is often the precursor to irrelevance. If everyone is wearing the three stripes because they were 30% off, the early adopters—the influencers and trendsetters who built the brand's current momentum—will inevitably flee for more exclusive pastures. Gulden is risking the brand’s long-term 'cool' for short-term balance sheet supremacy.

However, the Visionaries desk sees this as a necessary evolution. The bubble of the sneaker resale market has already shown signs of structural decay. By reclaiming the pricing power from third-party resellers and putting that value directly back into the consumer’s pocket, Adidas is insulating itself against a secondary market collapse. They are trading the volatile approval of the sneakerhead for the consistent, high-volume habits of the mass-market athlete and the everyday commuter. It is a cynical, brilliant, and high-stakes play for volume. In the war for the next decade, Adidas has decided that it would rather be everywhere than be exclusive. They aren't just selling shoes at a discount; they are pricing their rivals out of the cultural conversation by sheer force of ubiquity.

The Friday Brief

One essay. Every Friday. From operators who actually run things.

Join thousands of founders, partners, and operating leaders. No filler. Unsubscribe anytime.

Reader notes

0 Notes

Sign in to comment. Comments are signed and public.

Sign in →