Numerous Times

Inside Stories · Outside Proof

Field Notes

Field Notes

A Disturbance of Protocol and Life in the Lamarre-Condon Murder Trial

As the New South Wales Supreme Court hears testimony regarding the deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies, the prosecution focuses on the chilling details of the aftermath.

Numerous Times World Desk

Politics, conflict, disasters, and what's circulating

October 21, 2026 · 3 min read
A Disturbance of Protocol and Life in the Lamarre-Condon Murder Trial

Testimony in the New South Wales Supreme Court has recently shifted toward the specific and unsettling details surrounding the disposal of two bodies, as prosecutors build their case against Beau Lamarre-Condon. The former police officer stands accused of the murders of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies, a case that has transfixed the Australian public due to the defendant’s former position of trust and the high-profile nature of the victims. The latest court proceedings focused on a journey taken shortly after the killings, involving a borrowed van, a long drive into the countryside, and a series of interactions that the prosecution suggests point to a calculated attempt to conceal a double homicide.

Central to the recent testimony was a witness described as a friend of the accused, who traveled with Lamarre-Condon to Bungonia, a rural area south of Sydney. According to this account, the atmosphere inside the vehicle was heavy with suspicion. The witness described a pervasive scent of lemon cleaner throughout the cabin and the presence of a blue tarp in the rear, which the accused reportedly claimed was for transporting equipment. Most striking to the court was the allegation that during this drive, Lamarre-Condon played a specific song by Taylor Swift, titled “No Body, No Crime,” a track whose lyrics revolve around the successful concealment of a murder. The prosecution is using these details to paint a portrait of the defendant’s state of mind, suggesting a level of detachment and premeditation that complicates his legal defense.

This case matters beyond its immediate tragedy because it involves a former member of the New South Wales Police Force. When a serving or former officer is accused of using their training or authority in the commission of a violent crime, it inevitably triggers a crisis of confidence in law enforcement institutions. The public is not only watching the verdict but is also scrutinizing how the police handled internal red flags before the deaths occurred. Furthermore, the human cost of the case has resonated deeply within the LGBTQ+ community in Sydney, where the victims were well-known and respected figures.

As the trial progresses, the court will continue to evaluate the movements of the white van used in the alleged disposal and the timeline of Lamarre-Condon’s actions before he eventually surrendered to authorities. The defense is expected to challenge the interpretation of the defendant's behavior, while the prosecution remains focused on the forensic evidence and the testimony of those who crossed paths with the accused in the hours following the disappearances. The world is watching to see how the Australian justice system manages a case where the line between the enforcer of the law and the accused has become so violently blurred.

The Friday Brief

One essay. Every Friday. From operators who actually run things.

Join thousands of founders, partners, and operating leaders. No filler. Unsubscribe anytime.

Reader notes

0 Notes

Sign in to comment. Comments are signed and public.

Sign in →